Islamic Politics Research

Islamic Politics Research

The role of modern diplomacy in the hybrid war of the United States of America against the I.R.Iran (2015-2023)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student in International Relations, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran. dr.m.ch.91@gmail.com.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz,
10.22034/ipr.2024.459471.2134
Abstract
Hybrid warfare is an important phenomenon in international relations, involving a combination of hard, semi-hard, and soft tools to achieve strategic goals. In this context, modern diplomacy plays a fundamental and complex role. Given the importance of Iran's position in the region, understanding the effects and functions of modern diplomacy in the context of hybrid warfare seems essential for analyzing US policies. Therefore, the main question of this research is how modern diplomacy is used as a tool to combine hard and soft power in the US hybrid war against Iran (2015-2023) and what are its effects? The research method is descriptive-explanatory and the findings show that the US uses tools such as public diplomacy through institutions such as NAAC and the Advisory Council, second-track diplomacy with three approaches of compromise, deterrence, and war, military diplomacy, coercive diplomacy, and cyber diplomacy through platforms such as Twitter and Instagram.
Keywords
Subjects

Arquilla, J & Ronfeldt, D. (2009). The advent of netwar (revisited). In Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp1-25).
Carpenter, T. G. (2006). Iran's Nuclear Program, America's Policy Options. Retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa578.
Eisenstadt, M. (2020). Iran's economic diplomacy and its implications. Middle East Policy, 27(1), 31-45.
Fraser, Ronald J. (2002). "Complementarity between Unofficial Tracks: the Potential of Transfer from Interactive Conflict Resolution" International Peace and Conflict Resolution Program School of International Service. American University, Washington, DC 20016-8071. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association New Orleans, March.
Fitzpatrick, M. (2008). The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: Avoiding Worst-Case Outcomes. Retrieved from. http://www.iiss.org/en/publications/adelphi/by%20year/2008-e03b/the-iranian-nuclear- crisis-avoiding-worst-case-outcomes-cb9e.
Gilboa, E. (2002). Global communication and foreign policy.Journal of Communication.Retrieved from http://dw.com/p/11uvN.
Pompeo, M. (2018). After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/defense/event/after-the-deal-new-iran-strategy.
Roper, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence and cyber warfare: Strategic and tactical implications.Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 5(1), 23-45.
Volume 12, Issue 26 - Serial Number 26
Autumn and winter
March 2025
Pages 36-62

  • Receive Date 25 May 2024
  • Revise Date 21 September 2024
  • Accept Date 24 September 2024